COLUMN WARNING

Essential to any scientist's experimentation is reproducibility of results in order to further support or reject data or hypotheses. For a chromatographer, a separation that has been accomplished or optimized must be able to be repeated in subsequent HPLC analyses. Any anomaly that occurs can usually be attributed to either 1) the age of the column, 2) the chromatographer or 3) the manufacturer. Certain measures can limit the effects of age and the user. For example, proper column storage with the appropriate liquid interface, such as methanol for certain reverse-phase columns, with each end capped tightly assures no drying of the resin and increases "life" of the column. Use of a guard column can prevent the user from potentially contaminating or introducing unwanted particles into the column.Identifying the manufacturer as the chief culprit is many times unwarranted among peers or supervisers. However, there are certain instances where the irregularities can be aimed at the manufacturers. In these cases, column-to- column or batch-to-batch variations in the commercially available products must be addressed.Recently, a disparity in results originated from separation of proteins using reverse-phase HPLC (Welinder, 1995). Aprotinin, a 58-amino acid polypeptide, was the protein separated using a C4 column (Column 1) at pH 5 with sodium phosphate/ammonium sulfate buffer and an acetonitrile gradient. A new column (Column 2) from the same batch was acquired from the manufacturer and the resultant separation was characterized by different retention time, "tailing", and some loss of efficiency: (Welinder, 1995)The manufacturer admitted to changing the column packing procedure (using distilled water instead of tap water) upon inquiry.A similar study was performed using a C4 column produced by another manufacturer. In this case, biosynthetic human growth hormone (bhGH), a 191-amino acid protein, and TS-bhGH, a derivative of bhGH containing a tri-sulfide bridge (instead of a di-sulfide bridge), were separated at neutral pH with high resolution and efficiency (Welinder, 1995). However, when another column (Column 2) was purchased and tested, the separation of hGH and bhGH was totally absent: (Welinder, 1995)The company had no explanation for the occurance. However, it was determined that the original company had been taken over by another company since the first column was acquired, and the parent company could not trace the difference in batches.A scientist, more than any other user, should not assume a simplified situation where consistent results will be attained from the same model unless proven. In the case of chromatography, stationary phases should constantly be tested, calibrated, or analyzed. By no means should unwanted results be immediately attributed to faults of the manufacturer. On the other hand, the manufacturer should not be immune to reproach regarding divergent columns. In either case, the onus is placed on the user. Welinder, B.S.; Kornfelt, T.; Sorensen, H.H. Analytical Chemistry, 1995, Vol. 67, pp. 39-43.Return to columnsReturn to Theory of OperationReturn to Users Guide PageExit to the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy